[MinnowBoard] Regarding GSoC Project

Tushar Rajput tushraj21 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 21 17:34:19 UTC 2015

Thanks John for the reply,

Yes, I totally agree with you, both the approaches could be possible but
it'll be little mixed up and also re-working the shell script would also do
the work.
I'll try to add both the points into my proposal .

- Tushar

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:34 PM, John 'Warthog9' Hawley <
warthog9 at eaglescrag.net> wrote:

> On 03/20/2015 10:32 PM, Tushar Rajput wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the past days I was consulting Make Documentation to get the deeper
> > knowledge in that area  and I thought that this would be better for
> > resolving the issues of current build system because it would  be the
> > least tedious path.
> >
> > As I was working on GSoc application and wants to add this function  as
> > a primary  solution for cleaning up the build system .Which do you think
> > would be more efficient and beneficial for the build system, either
> > re-working the shell or converting it to the Makefiles ?
> I don't know, mainly because I can see both approaches as being useful
> to people.  In it's simplest form just re-working the shell script may
> be enough, and obviously offers us a lot more flexibility than
> Makefiles.  On the flip side Makefiles mean just typing `make` and
> having something build.  I'm happy to entertain both approaches, and if
> a student is feeling particularly adventurous it's possible to do both
> with a little bit of planning.
> - John
> _______________________________________________
> elinux-MinnowBoard mailing list
> elinux-MinnowBoard at lists.elinux.org
> http://lists.elinux.org/mailman/listinfo/elinux-minnowboard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.elinux.org/pipermail/elinux-minnowboard/attachments/20150321/76d7d8f4/attachment.html>

More information about the elinux-MinnowBoard mailing list